Philip Linden testifies before Congress
by Aldon Huffhines
April 01, 2008
The avatar of Rep Ed Markey presides over the virtual hearing. (Photo by Rik Panganiban, used by permission)

WASHINGTON – Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA), known in Second Life as EdMarkey Alter conducted hearings for the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet entitled “Online Virtual Worlds: Applications and Avatars in a User-Generated Medium.” The four witnesses were Philip Linden, Glitteractica Cookie, Larry Pixel and Colin Parris.

The hearing took place both in Washington as well as in Second Life. Rep. Markey started off by noting many of the great benefits that Second Life brings. He spoke about Wilde Cunningham, an avatar created by disabled people from a center in Massachusetts. He spoke about the use Second Life by groups like the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and The American Cancer Society (ACS) as well as the business potential of Second Life.

However, he noted that Second Life raises many important policy issues. They surround topics like consumer protection and personal privacy. In specific, he expressed concerns about banking, gambling and child protection.

He used the hearings as an opportunity to stress the importance of broadband deployment across the country; addressing concerns about the digital divide and for keeping internet access open.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) noted that Chevrolet had space in Second Life where car buffs could speak with Chevy representatives and noted IBM’s use of Second Life. He said that Congress needs to be vigilant about crime in virtual worlds, particularly fraud and sexual predators. At the same time he expressed a hope that virtual worlds could flourish without over-regulation.

Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) who describes her Congressional Website as a Virtual Office had some of the best comments. She observed that many people may wonder if Members of Congress live in some sort of virtual world, based on the way they fly in and out so quickly. She also noted that she suspected that the real reason the subcommittee was holding the hearing was so that Rep. Markey could find how to get past the seventh level of World of Warcraft. However, she noted, you only get two experience points being at the hearing. On a more serious note, she expressed concern about the possible use of Second Life by terrorists as noted in recent news reports. That said, she did advocate censorship.

Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) noted that his children played Runescape, but expressed concern about the work avatar coming from a Hindu or Buddhist god’s name. Rep. Eshoo (D-CA) couldn’t help but think of the phrase “get a life”. She noted that social networking was once outside of the mainstream and now was part of the mainstream and pondered if the same would apply to virtual worlds. Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) noted the importance of Second Life to education and then expressed concern about protecting children online and about the addictive nature of Second Life.


View More Articles By This Author

Tools:  Save  |  Print  |  E-mail  |  Most Popular

Comments
Rep. John Shimkus's concern about the word avatar coming from a Hindu 'God' is interesting. I will probably never understand his concern, but surprised that somebody in that position had this thought. Is this racism in disguise? oh well. In any case, to clarify, an avatar is NOT a God in Hindu Philosophy. It means 'representation', the 'form of' an agent in a given reality. That is why intelligent folks picked this name this is exactly what an 'avatar' is.
Moriz Gupte |
"Pixel was asked about the possibility of students becoming addicted to Second Life and questions were asked about whether or not Linden Lab should consider ways of trying to control the amount of time that people use Second Life."

Oh great. Just what we need. Big Brother telling us how much time we can use Second Life per day. Do they regulate how much television people can watch per day? I think not. I would much rather hang out in an interactive world where I can create content and talk to people from all over the world, rather than sitting in my recliner eating potato chips out of the bag and watching the latest reality tv shows. Has anyone suggested that reality tv shows are addictive, and their use should be limited? No. Why? Because if you limit the use of television, you limit the market exposure of advertisements, and the corporations would start screaming at the government.

Please don't let them pass some stupid bill that limits my access to Second Life. I am mostly homebound, and it is a large part of my life.

Princess Ivory
Princess Ivory |
Mr. Braver summed up the experience nicely by observing, “My hope is that this is the beginning of a conversation and sparks decisions towards supportive legislation to benefit the global community's usage of 3D spaces.”

We all know what "supportive legislation" means - govenment regulations and taxes, taxes.....
Dear Lindens - pack all your servers and emigrate to SEALAND ISLAND before its too late. And say NO to RL authorities.
Jacek Shuftan |

 
Add Comment
Name:
Email:
URL:
Keep Me Updated:
Comments:
 
All of SLNN The Web
The M and Philip Linden Show at SLCC
The banking ban, seven months later
SLim, voice mail and phone numbers on the near horizon
Building a better mousetrap (UI)
Teen Grid: a disadvantaged grid