Protests in Second Life
by Aldon Huffhines
April 21, 2008
Residents of Second Life raise a fst in protest

Residents of Second Life have many different views of what provides the true value of Second Life, and of what promotes brand loyalty to Second Life. For many, it is the community-creative and interesting people that draws others to Second Life.

Companies wishing to do business in Second Life recognize this value. They want to reach people who are thought leaders, who are well connected. Yet many feel that recent actions by Linden Lab have further eroded the community and have done considerable damage to the Second Life brand.

Others feel that what is most compelling about the Second Life brand is the platform. Second Life is the environment where they can most easily and reliably create three-dimensional objects that they can sell and share with other. For these people, the stability of the environment is extremely important, especially as residents plan events where they can gather with others to demonstrate new objects, new places, or simply discuss important issues.

This ties back to the ideas of the Second Life community. Yet recent instability of the platform, together with changes in basic level hardware required for the Second Life viewer have frustrated residents.

Meanwhile, it appears to many as if Linden Lab views their most important asset as the assorted trademarks that they own. They have instituted new policies that go far beyond what normal companies do to protect their trademark; they have threatened to ban residents of Second Life from using their systems if they improperly use any Second Life trademarks. This would be similar to Coca Cola Corporation managing to prevent anyone who uses the word ‘Coke’ when referring any other soft drink from drinking their Coca Cola brand soft drink. It has left a sour taste in the mouth of many residents.

At the same time, recent changes to Second Life have required residents to upgrade their viewers. This has presented problems for many, especially those in education who have to support many machines, which barely meet minimum requirements to even run SL.  In response to these concerns, Linden Lab held a few  inworld informational sessions with Pastrami Linden. Pastrami discussed how to optimize the latest viewers for older hardware. Linden Lab maintains that the latest viewers are even faster than the old ones.

The main grid, itself, has not been all that stable during this period, and residents have sought different ways of dealing with their frustration about the outages. Many have simply taken pleasant walks


View More Articles By This Author

Tools:  Save  |  Print  |  E-mail  |  Most Popular

Comments
Resist. Revolt.
crashing sim |
I think this sort of protest is better than ambushing the blog and ruining what is left of Linden or other organized fun inworld.

The I-world event was a positive event and opportunity for musicians, and those who went there just wanted to have a great time while they can.

It is absolutely selfish when some protesters came to take away all the glory and the spirit of the event. People won't take the message they want to put across and rally with them and instead will be angry at them because they are taking the limelight away from the singers and from the Lindens who are not concerned with the issues happening inworld. Those Lindens have a job to do too, which is TOTALLY separated from handling inworld issues. Let them be.
Isadora Fiddlesticks |
"...they have threatened to ban residents of Second Life from using their systems if they improperly use any Second Life trademarks."

Please cite your source on this; it directly conflicts with a statement Linden Lab made on the SL blog a few days ago:

http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/04/18/more-on-trademarks/ (Point #1.)

I am not trying to defend Linden Lab here, but would like to know where this statement came from.
Concerned Reader |
" Pastrami discussed how to optimize the latest viewers for older hardware."

SHARE! SHARE!
Hellespont |
I've been so ticked off by the lack of stability over the last several weeks (heck this really has been going on for years), that I'm going to sell all my land and just keep my premium 512m parcel. That's my form of protest, hit them where it hurts. Their wallets.
Esch Snoats |
Dear god, it's becoming a governmental entity. The question here now is - Will the metaverse posess a government of the free, or a facist oligarcy. My bet is, sadly, with the ladder.
Trevor Crow |
I've been so ticked off by the lack of stability over the last several weeks (heck this really has been going on for years), that I'm going to sell all my land and just keep my premium 512m parcel. That's my form of protest, hit them where it hurts. Their wallets.
صور |
"Please cite your source on this; it directly conflicts with a statement Linden Lab made on the SL blog a few days ago:"

No, this is in fact a threat. Linden says they will issue several warnings, yes. But they will still reserve the right to ban you unless you abide by their interpretation, however with the graceful option of: "Residents would have an opportunity to request reversal of the ban by sending us a written appeal."

Linden Lab has now turned into a trademark-protecting content-creating project instead of providing its creative user base with a stable platform to produce content on. Instead of using their incredibly fortunate position to preserve goodwill, establish and develop as "The" grid provider for virtual worlds, they are digging their own grave with this.
Even More Concerned |

 
Add Comment
Name:
Email:
URL:
Keep Me Updated:
Comments:
 
All Of The SLNN The Web
Relay For Life: celebrating survivors, paying for research
BlogHer Conference begins today
Group plans an alternative to each LL sponsored event
Grassroots politics: Dean and Clark in Second Life via Netroots Nation
Second Life Community Convention set to roll